I Tried 5 Otter Alternatives, and only one was truly worth keeping

I Tried 5 Otter Alternatives — And Only One Was Truly Worth Keeping

Table of Contents
    Add a header to begin generating the table of contents

    Try Proactor Now

    Need smarter meeting outcomes? Let Proactor AI turn your words into action

    Is it just me, or is Otter no longer enough for real work?

    I used Otter.ai for over two years. Back when all I wanted was a meeting transcript, it did the job. But as my meetings became faster-paced, more outcome-driven, and cross-functional, I found myself needing more than just “notes.”

    I needed a meeting tool that didn’t just listen — it had to think with me.

    So I tested 5 of the most talked-about Otter alternatives in 2025. Here’s how they really performed — and why one of them completely changed how I run meetings.

    TL;DR: These Tools Are Fine. One Is Different.

    ToolWhat It’s Good AtStarting PriceWhy I Didn’t Stick With It
    ProactorReal-time insights, action items, cross-meeting memoryFree trial, then from $15.99/month (affordable & powerful)The only one that helped me do better work — not just document it.
    Fireflies.aiBroad integrations, 100+ languagesFree; Pro $10, Business $19, Enterprise $39/monthAccurate, but lacks true context awareness.
    FathomInstant highlight clips, Zoom syncStandard $19, Pro $29/monthGreat for content — weak for actual execution.
    AvomaSales coaching, CRM sync, reportingStartup $19, Organization $29, Enterprise $39/seat/monthToo heavy for agile teams, best for enterprise.
    MeetJamieFast summaries, privacy-first setupFree; Paid from €24–€99/monthSimple and clean, but not built for scale or depth.

    #1 Proactor — The Only One That Actually “Got” the Meeting

    Let’s get right to it: Proactor wasn’t just the best tool I tested — it was in a different category altogether.

    Other tools gave me transcripts. Some even offered pretty summaries. But Proactor listened like a teammate, surfaced what mattered, and suggested what to do next — all while the meeting was still happening.

    What makes it different?

    • Suggests follow-ups and tasks in real-time, not just after
    • Automatically pulls insights, objections, next steps — with context
    • Uses a built-in chat assistant (Potor) to recall prior meetings and answer questions like “What did the client say about budget last time?”
    • Outputs a structured Wiki after every call, with action items, AI insights, and summarized decisions

    The result? I didn’t just remember what we said — I actually acted on it, faster than ever.

    The others gave me a receipt. Proactor gave me momentum.

    Pricing:

    • Free trial available
    • Pro: $15.99/month (annual billing)
    • Business: $39.99/month (annual billing)
    • Enterprise: Custom pricing

    Proactor pricing feels like one of those rare times where you get way more than what you paid for.

    2. Fireflies.ai — Powerful, but Lacks a Real Brain

    Fireflies is impressive in terms of reach: it integrates with Zoom, Meet, Teams, Slack, Notion — basically your whole tool stack. It supports over 100 languages and has a GPT-style bot to query past calls.

    But here’s the thing:

    • It transcribes everything, but doesn’t know what matters.
    • It can detect “action items,” but you have to dig for them.
    • It feels more like a smart recorder than an active participant.

    Pricing:

    • Free: $0
    • Pro: $10/month
    • Business: $19/month
    • Enterprise: $39/month

    Fireflies is affordable upfront, but you may quickly wish it did more once your needs get serious.

    Verdict: A solid recorder with good integrations, but still feels like a reactive tool, not a proactive assistant.

    3. Fathom — Great for Content, Weak on Execution

    Fathom is fast, sleek, and perfect for content teams. You can tag moments in real-time and create video snippets right after meetings.

    But:

    • It doesn’t understand tasks, blockers, or priorities.
    • It can’t recall themes across multiple calls.
    • It’s not built for ownership — just reflection.

    Pricing:

    • Standard: $19/month per user
    • Pro: $29/month per user (2 user min)
    • Free read-only accounts available

    Fathom makes sense if content is your main game — otherwise, it can feel like an expensive extra.

    Verdict: Fathom is like a video highlighter for Zoom — fast and intuitive. But it’s not built to manage long-term workflows.

    4. Avoma — Enterprise Muscle, But Too Much for Most

    Avoma is robust — especially for sales orgs. You get coaching tools, pipeline tracking, CRM integrations, even revenue forecasting.

    But:

    • It’s expensive
    • It requires heavy onboarding
    • It’s not agile enough for fast-moving teams or general collaboration

    Pricing:

    • Startup: $19/seat/month (recorders only)
    • Organization: $29/seat/month
    • Enterprise: $39/seat/month

    Avoma can be great if you’re running a full sales operation — but for most teams, it might be more than you really need.

    Verdict: If you run a revenue team and want call coaching + sales forecasting, Avoma is top-tier. But for day-to-day notes? Too much.

    5. MeetJamie — Clean, Light, but Limited

    Jamie is all about privacy and simplicity. It runs natively on your laptop (no bots), summarizes calls in 20+ languages, and works with in-person or virtual meetings.

    It’s fast. It’s elegant. It’s secure.

    But:

    • It doesn’t connect to your tools or calendars
    • It doesn’t offer suggestions, reminders, or deeper intelligence
    • It’s not built for long-term knowledge capture

    Pricing:

    • Free: €0
    • Standard: €24/month
    • Pro: €47/month
    • Executive: €99/month
    • Jamie’s upper tiers feel expensive considering the lack of smart integrations or workflow depth.

    Jamie’s minimalist vibe is refreshing, but you might pause when the higher-tier pricing kicks in.

    Verdict: Jamie is like your minimalist notetaker — fast, clean, and respectful of your privacy. Just don’t expect deep AI.

    Why Proactor Was the Only One That Stayed

    I didn’t just need transcription.

    I needed:

    • Real-time awareness of what was happening in the meeting
    • Suggestions that weren’t obvious or annoying
    • A way to remember, link, and act on conversations across weeks

    Only Proactor delivered on all three. The others documented the meeting.

    Proactor joined the meeting.

    That’s the difference.

    Final Thoughts: If You Want More Than Notes, Choose More Than a Note-Taker

    Otter got us used to automatic transcripts.

    But 2025 isn’t about saving what was said. It’s about surfacing what to do — faster, smarter, and without more mental load.

    That’s what Proactor is for.

    If you’re done with passive AI note-takers and want an assistant that actually helps you think, decide, and move — go try Proactor now.